​

Why One Strategy Puts Your Lifetime Income and Legacy First — and the Other Puts a Commission Check Above All Else

 

​

​

Let’s Start With A Fair Acknowledgment
 

If you’re skeptical about annuities, you have every reason to be.
 

For decades, certain corners of the insurance industry have deserved that skepticism. High-pressure sales tactics, exaggerated bonuses, and confusing surrender schedules have left many retirees frustrated, misled, and distrustful of the word “annuity.”
 

And truthfully?

Many of those horror stories are real. They happened because too many people selling annuities were never trained—or licensed—to design a true retirement plan.
 

But that’s the key distinction:

The problem isn’t the annuity. The problem is how—and why—it’s sold.
 

When annuities are pushed as standalone products, they can absolutely be restrictive, confusing, and counterproductive. But when they’re used properly—as part of a fiduciary-engineered income plan—they can be one of the most efficient, stabilizing, and mathematically sound financial tools available to retirees.
 

And that’s why many of the most strictly regulated fiduciaries in the entire financial industry—Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs)—are among the strongest advocates of properly designed annuity strategies.
 

 

When the Highest Fiduciary Standard in Finance Uses Annuities — That Speaks Volumes
 

Not all financial licenses carry the same level of fiduciary responsibility.
 

Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) and their Series 65–licensed Investment Adviser Representatives (IARs)are bound by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to act in the client’s best interest—at all times, without exception.
 

This isn’t a voluntary “code of ethics”; it’s a legal mandate enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and state regulators.

Violating it can lead to civil penalties, suspensions, or permanent loss of license.
 

That makes the Series 65 license the highest fiduciary standard in the financial services world—higher even than the CFP® designation, which answers only to a private board rather than to state or federal law.
 

And yet, despite being held to this higher standard, thousands of RIAs actively recommend annuities—including commission-based contracts—when those solutions serve the client’s best interest.
 

How can that be?

Because commission-based products are not inherently evil, unethical, or illegal. In fact, the SEC itself has stated that advisers may recommend commission-based products if doing so is in the client’s best interest and the cost structure is fully disclosed.
 

 

Why Commission-Based Products Are Not Inherently Unethical
 

When you peel away the marketing slogans, a simple truth remains: it’s not the compensation method that creates conflicts—it’s the intent behind the advice.
 

A fiduciary’s obligation is to put math, logic, and the client’s best interest before marketing. That means evaluating every available tool—including annuities—based on measurable benefit to the client.
 

Unfortunately, Wall Street has spent decades conditioning investors to believe “fees good, commissions bad.”

Why?

Because every time a retiree moves $500,000 into a fixed income annuity, that’s $500,000 that can’t be billed for a 1% annual management fee over the next 20 years.
 

Fiduciary advisors, however, understand what the math proves: when used correctly, commission-based fixed annuities can be the most client-friendly, cost-efficient solution on the table.
 

 

How Commission-Based Fixed Annuities Actually Work
 

When a fiduciary recommends a fixed annuity, the commission is paid by the insurance company—not by the client.
 

If you invest $300,000 into a fixed annuity, every penny goes to work immediately. Your principal, growth, and income are never reduced to pay compensation.

The insurer pays the advisor from its own operating spread, just as a bank pays its employees when issuing CDs
.

Banks earn a spread between what they pay depositors and what they earn lending or investing those funds.

Insurance companies do the same: they invest client premiums primarily in high-grade bonds, earn a spread, cover internal costs, pay advisor compensation, and still honor all guarantees.
 

No hidden deductions. No asset-based fees. No erosion of your balance.
 

So when designed properly, commission-based annuities easily meet fiduciary standards—because their economics do not harm the client and often produce far better outcomes than traditional income methods.
 

 

Follow the Money: The Math Wall Street Hopes You Never Run
 

Here’s the part the fee-based world doesn’t want retirees to calculate.
 

If a fiduciary advisor helps a retiree allocate $500,000 into a fixed income annuity, the typical one-time compensation might be around 7%, or $35,000. That amount is paid by the insurance company, not the client.

The retiree’s entire $500,000 begins working for the retiree: Growing, deferring, and generating guaranteed lifetime income completely net/free of any commissions.
 

Now compare that to keeping the same $500,000 in a fee-based managed portfolio charging 1% per year. That’s $5,000 annually, deducted directly from the client’s account, every single year.
 

Over a 20-year retirement, with moderate portfolio growth of roughly 6% per year, those fees compound to somewhere between $160,000 and $180,000—all paid by the retiree.
 

To restate:
 

• The fiduciary recommending an annuity earns $35,000 once, paid by the insurer.
   

• The fee-based advisor earns $160,000–$180,000 over 20 years, paid directly by the client.
   

Now ask yourself:

If an advisor were truly motivated by self-interest, which option would they prefer—the one that pays once, or the one that pays forever?

​

When a fiduciary recommends an annuity that removes assets from their management base, they’re not serving themselves—they’re willingly giving up recurring revenue to secure their client’s income for life.

​

That isn’t greed. It’s integrity quantified.

 

​

The Fiduciary Test: Math Over Method

​

At the core of fiduciary planning is a single question:

​

“Which option mathematically produces the best outcome for this client’s goals and risk tolerance?”

​

When answered with numbers rather than narratives, annuities often win.

​

A retiree needing $60,000 per year of guaranteed income might require $1 million in a bond or dividend portfolio to draw that safely. Yet the same outcome could be achieved with $700,000–$750,000 through laddered income annuities—leaving $250,000 + available for liquidity, growth, or legacy goals.

​

That’s not a sales pitch. That’s arithmetic.

​

Rejecting that solution because it pays a commission would actually violate the fiduciary duty of objectivity.

 

Transparency: The Difference Between a Product and a Plan

​

When annuities are sold, the conversation revolves around the product—bonuses, caps, riders, “market upside.”

When annuities are planned, the conversation revolves around the solution—income efficiency, tax integration, and inflation protection.

​

A fiduciary planner starts with a problem:

How do we create sustainable, risk-free income for 30 years?

How can we increase yield without increasing exposure?

​

Once those answers are modeled mathematically, the annuity becomes the instrument, not the headline.

 

That transparency transforms an annuity from a misunderstood product into a precision-engineered income mechanism—one that delivers what traditional portfolios can only promise: reliable, sustainable income with less capital and less risk.

​

 

Why Wall Street Fears Annuities

​

It’s not that Wall Street believes annuities are bad—it’s that they’re bad for Wall Street’s business model.

​

Every dollar transferred to a guaranteed income contract is a dollar no longer generating annual fees.

 

Across thousands of clients, that’s billions in lost recurring revenue—hence the propaganda war against annuities.

The irony is that many “fee-only” advisors preaching transparency never disclose what clients will really pay in lifetime fees.

​

For example, $1 million managed at 1% for 20 years—assuming 6% average growth—creates over $350,000 in cumulative fees. That’s six years of retirement income gone to management costs alone.

​

Fiduciaries show you that math. Wall Street avoids it.

 

​

The Licensing Gap: Suitability vs. Fiduciary

​

One of the biggest reasons annuities have a mixed reputation isn’t the product—it’s who’s allowed to sell them.

​

In most states, becoming an insurance agent takes only a short pre-licensing course and a basic exam. Once licensed, these individuals can sell annuities under the “suitability standard.”

​

That standard requires only that a product be appropriate—not optimal. Agents don’t have to compare alternatives, disclose commissions, or prove long-term efficiency. As long as the sale isn’t blatantly harmful, it’s deemed “suitable.”

 

By contrast, fiduciary advisors—those holding a Series 65 license under an RIA—operate under the fiduciary standard, a legal requirement to act solely in the client’s best interest and document why every recommendation was made.

​

The difference is night and day:

​

• Suitability means “good enough.”
   

• Fiduciary means “in the best possible interest of the client."
   

This is why horror stories about annuities exist—but why they’re so easily avoidable with a little education.

The simple fact is, there are “bad apple” non-fiduciary agents out there selling annuities with big commission dollar signs in their eyes.  It an unfortunate but irrefutable fact.  
 

Most bad annuity outcomes come from untrained, insurance-only salespeople pushing products they barely understand, not from fiduciary planners integrating annuities into mathematical income designs.
 

When a fiduciary uses an annuity, it isn’t to sell something—it’s to solve something.

 

The Evolution of Advice
 

The modern fiduciary advisor merges tools once seen as opposites:

Guaranteed annuities for lifetime stability, and low-cost ETFs for long-term growth.
 

This dual-engine approach gives retirees the best of both worlds—security and opportunity, income and flexibility, protection and freedom.
 

Now, with the rise of AI-driven financial modeling, fiduciaries can build and stress-test these portfolios with unmatched precision. Tools like ChatGPT allow retirees to see real-time income comparisons, growth projections, and fee impacts.
 

The result?

Transparent, math-driven clarity that no sales pitch can compete with.

 

A Fiduciary Future
 

The future of retirement planning belongs to advisors who combine math, law, and technology—not to those clinging to outdated, fee-driven sales models.
 

Fiduciary annuity planning isn’t about replacing markets; it’s about replacing uncertainty with design.

It builds portfolios that are efficient, resilient, and engineered to last a lifetime—without relying on luck or speculation.
 

At National Annuity Educators, we are a national network of fiduciary advisors and RIAs who have helped thousands of retirees unhook their portfolios from unnecessary management fees and rebuild mathematically balanced income plans—rooted in transparency, logic, and trust.
 

1. Research the agent/advisor you are interviewing.

2. Stick with licensed fiduciaries.

3. Understand how to easily spot and avoid the bad actors in the marketplace.

4. Discover what a fiduciary annuity plan can really do for your retirement.

5. And above all, don't let the explainable and easily avoidable "bad apple" stories about annuities cause you to miss out on enjoying these modern income powerhouses.